Account-based marketing has moved from buzzword to boardroom agenda. Most enterprise B2B teams now have some form of ABM in motion. The problem is that most of them are doing Stage One or Stage Two work and calling it a mature program — and wondering why the results plateau.
"ABM is not a campaign type. It is an organisational operating model. Most firms treat it like the former and are surprised when it performs like the latter."
The Four Stages
Why Stage Two Is a Trap
Stage Two feels mature because it requires real coordination. There are shared lists, regular sales-marketing meetings, and content that references the account by name. Leadership sees activity and assumes progress.
But Stage Two ABM is still fundamentally interruption-based. You are pushing messages at accounts. You have not yet built the infrastructure to attract and detect accounts that are already in-market. The program lives and dies on the quality of your outbound, which means it is subject to all the diminishing returns that outbound faces in a crowded enterprise market.
The Move to Stage Three
The single highest-leverage move for most B2B firms is expanding from single-contact to buying-committee coverage. This requires mapping the typical committee structure for your deals — who is typically involved, in what sequence, with what concerns — and building content and engagement strategies for each role.
It is more work. It is also the work that separates firms with 20% win rates from those with 35% win rates on comparable opportunities. At enterprise deal sizes, that difference compounds quickly.
Where is your ABM program on the curve? If you are not sure, the answer is probably Stage Two. Most firms are.
The Billion Effect helps B2B firms build and scale ABM programs that go beyond coordinated outreach — into genuine pipeline infrastructure. If you're ready to move past Stage Two, let's talk.
Start a Conversation